Friday, October 07, 2016



As selfies continue to rise in popularity around the world, it is useful to explore the history of the self-portrait and find the distinction between self-indulgence and art






Selfies are nothing new. People have been creating self-portraits since the 15th century; in fact, the first self-portraits were akin to modern day photo-bombs, with artists painting themselves into crowd scenes in historical, mythological or religious paintings. Jan van Eyck’s self-image can be seen in a mirror in the Arnolfini Portrait (1434). Diego Velázquez painted himself into Las Meniñas (1656), a portrait of the Spanish royal family, essentially setting himself up as the first portrait-bomber, the first truly modern artist. An infant might well have said, “Hey, I thought we were going to get a nice family portrait. What’s Velázquez’ big head doing in the shot?”
 Velázquez’ big breakout in painting himself into the portrait was essentially a statement that the artist can be more important than the painting. He proclaimed to the world that this portrait of royals also staked the claim that the artist is greater than the work itself; the artist becomes one with his art.





Some have speculated that Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa (1503–1506) may actually be a self- portrait of the artist in drag. Though probably not so, it is interesting to ponder that da Vinci, who did have a hidden side to himself, could keep that aspect hidden, yet revealed simultaneously.

Virginia Oldoini Countess of Castiglione (1837–1899), better known as La Castiglione, a mistress of Napoleon, was the first to effectively and exhaustively use the new medium of photography for her selfies. She had herself photographed over 700 times over four decades at a time when just one could be a day-long affair, dressing herself as a variety of historical and mythological figures, usually embedded in elaborate tableaux art directed by the Countess herself. She only laid aside her photography practice after advancing age began to alter her face. She could no longer stand seeing herself.

The queen of self-portraiture in art history has to be Frida Kahlo, who was the first major international artist to use herself as the central subject of almost all of her work. Obsessed with self-image, she famously said, “I paint myself because I am so often alone and because I am the subject I know best.”






Using herself as a subject allowed her to expose herself and explore all her hopes, fears, dreams, accidents, operations, miscarriages, infidelities, the alarmingly public break-ups with famed artist husband, Diego Rivera, as well as her highly publicized affair with Leon Trotsky, prior to his murder by Stalin.

Arguably today’s “Mistress of Selfies” is Kim Kardashian, who posts pictures of herself on social media that are picked up by news services and published daily, often in excessively revealing costumes. Once, on a vacation to Thailand, Kardashian took 1,200 selfies in a single week’s time. And in 2014, she published a book containing 357 selfies. One wonders if she will stop taking selfies as she ages, as others have done, or will she develop as an artist and begin to reveal truly thoughtful insights on herself through her portraits. In the 22nd Century, will the late Kim Kardashian be lauded as one of the great artists of the early 21st Century, or will she be remembered, if at all, as a narcissistic fame-whore?


Before you take that next selfie and post it on your Facebook page or Instagram, ask yourself what the portrait says about you, truly. Is it just another fish-lip photo? Or are you revealing something real and true about yourself? Is it just a selfie or is it art?

Enjoy!!



Wednesday, October 05, 2016


A new exhibition at Stanford University’s Cantor Arts Center,“Sympathy for the Devil: Satan, Sin, and the Underworld,” traces Lucifer’s visual history, from his emergence in the Middle Ages as a horned, cloven-hoofed, foul-smelling, diabolical creature of the night to his denuded and largely ironic image today.
“By around 1500, his visage and characteristics were pretty well set,” Bernard Barryte, Cantor’s curator of European art, tells Quartz. “He was initially a conflation of sundry things. Everything from Pan to Near Eastern gods got mushed together in the Middle Ages and became what we know of as the devil.”
In the 16th and 17th century, grisly paintings of the Evil One were intended literally, Barryte says.”They were meant to have a moral effect, which is why artists made him awful looking. Even if you were educated, you would wonder, ‘What if?’ No matter how sceptical one might be today, there was real faith underlying this imagery.”

The Enlightenment began to change that. As our conception of evil shifted, so did our personification of the devil. “He becomes more human, even romanticized, after the popular revolutions of the late 18th century, especially the French Revolution,” Barryte says. In the 19th century, the devil was often depicted as a “shrewd and wily dandy,” a Mephistophelean figure, who would trick you out of your soul, not brutally tear it from you. “Fear is no longer his most effective tactic,” Barryte says. “And in the 20th century, he all but disappears except in advertisements.”
In his place—well, look in the mirror. “Hell is other people, is how Jean-Paul Sartre put it,” Barryte says. “All the sources of evil seemed to shift from some horrific other to mankind itself.”
For a nostalgic look at the devil’s many guises (along with depictions of his realm and minions), here’s a selection of works in the exhibition, which is on view through November 30:














Tuesday, October 04, 2016







Anthony Howe (born 1954, Salt Lake City, Utah) is an American kinetic sculptor who creates wind-driven sculptures resembling pulsing, alien creatures and vortices. He makes use of computer-aided design, shaping the metal components with a plasma cutter, and completing his work by use of traditional metalworking techniques. Howe notably designed a cauldron and accompanying kinetic sculpture for the 2016 Summer Olympics!!

Anthony Howe
Pioneer artist of Kinetic Art
“I attempt, with an economy of means, to construct objects whose visual references range from lo-tech sci-fi paraphernalia to microbiological or astronomical models. Utilizing primarily stainless steel armatures that are driven either by hammered curvilinear shapes or flat fiberglass covered discs, I hope the pieces assume a spare, linear elegance when conditions are still, mutating to raucous animation when the wind picks up. Multiple axis finely balanced forms, both symmetrical and asymmetrical, conspire to create a visually satisfying three-dimensional harmony.”
Anthony Howe

In August 2015, Howe was offered the role of designing a cauldron for the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The games' organizers had decided to eschew a larger cauldron and flame as part of an effort to be environmentally conscious, resulting in the construction of a small cauldron with a larger kinetic sculpture to accompany it; the sculpture, which consists of ring of rotating bars, a 40 ft (12.2 m) in diameter, with reflective plates and spheres, was meant to enhance the appearance of the smaller flame, providing an effect inspired by the "pulsing energy and reflection of light" of the sun. The sculpture was designed at his studio on Orcas Island, with final construction occurring in Montreal before being shipped to Rio.

Checkout this cool video!! Truly Art is marvelous...


Art can be complicated. Often, it is difficult to interpret its meaning or unearth the message that the artist wants to convey. Other times, it is difficult to understand the techniques and methods used.
However, art also belongs to various different categories and art movements that further complicate things. Some movements are straightforward, others not so much. Below we have compiled a list of the strangest and most obscure art movements that existed or still exist in the world.

10. Intentism

If you have ever been to an art exhibition and wondered what exactly the artist meant with his piece of art, you probably know that sometimes understanding the meaning and intention of art can be rather difficult. Perhaps there is no intention in art, we wonder. Or perhaps the intention and the message is whatever we decide it to be. However, followers of Intentism would disagree.
Intentism is an international art movement of artists, authors, actors and musicians who believe that art can convey an intended message to those viewing it.
Intentists follow three principles. Firstly, they feel that artists are free to convey their message to society. Secondly, they believe that confused, hidden or denied intentions lead to zero accountability. Thirdly and lastly, they think that the exclusion of intention can lead to enforced restrictions on the artist.
Indeed, Intentists believe that through the rejection of intention and authorship, creative work becomes indifferent and anaemic.

9. Orphism Art Movements


Orphism, also called Orphic Cubism or Simultaneism, is a trend in abstract art which derived from Cubism. The movement was named by a French poet, Guillaume Apollinaire, in 1912, and gives priority to light and colour. Apollinaire thought that this new style of painting brought musical qualities to the paintings. The name Orphism comes from Orpheus, a poet and singer from ancient Greece mythology.
The movement was started by Robert Delaunay and his wife, Sonia Delaunay-Terk. Unlike Cubists, they believed colour to be a powerful element in their art, although just like Cubists, they were greatly interested in geometric fragmentation.
The movement was short-lived and came to an end before World War I.

8. Fluxus Art Movements

Fluxus was a group of artists that were known for blending different artistic media in the 1960s. Fluxus artists could be found all over the world but an especially large concentration of them could be found in New York as well as various German cities.
George Maciunas is considered to be the main founder of the group. He coined the name ‘Fluxus’ and edited the movement’s numerous publications.
Followers of Fluxus strongly disagreed with the idea that museums have the right to decide the value of art. They also did not think that viewers of art have to be in any way educated to view and understand art. Not only did members of Fluxus desire to make all art acceptable to the public – they also wanted to ensure that each and every individual produced art regurlarly.

7. Arte Povera

Arte povera, or poor art, was an artistic movement that emerged in the 1960s. Members of this group were Italian artists who created their art from commonplace materials such as rocks, clothing and paper. The group rejected minimalism and modernist abstract painting.
The name of the movement was introduced by the Italian art critic and curator, Germano Celant. He wanted the name to convey the notion of art made without restraints, a complete and utter opennes to materials and processes.
The group’s most memorable art, however, comes from their use of unprocessed materials with references to consumer culture. The group aimed at contrasting the new and the old to complicate our sense of the passing time.

6. Yellowism

In 2012, a vandal named Vladimir Umanets scrawled graffiti on Mark Rothko’s mural which was on exhibit at London’s Tate Modern. The graffiti read “Vladimir Umanets, A Potential Piece of Yellowism.” With that, the movement of Yellowism gained international recognition.
Yellowism is an artistic movement run by two people – Vladimir Umanets and Marcin Lodyga. The movement began in Egypt in 2010 when the first exhibition was unveiled and has continued since, although grasping Yellowism is not an easy task. Apparently, in order for a piece of art to be considered as a part of Yellowism, it needs to be either displayed in a yellow gallery-like space or signed by a Yellowist.
Umanets also says that “The main difference between Yellowism and art is that in art you have got freedom of interpretation, in Yellowism you don’t have freedom of interpretation, everything is about Yellowism, that’s it.” Indeed, to most people the movement of Yellowism just seems like vandalism and obscure nonsense, but perhaps Yellowists will eventually surprise us all.

5. Mannerism Art Movements

Mannerism originated in Italy in 1520, and soon spread throughout Europe. Instead of focusing on naturalistic representations, this movement concentrated on complexity and virtuosity. Giuseppe Arcimboldo, the artist behind portraits made entirely of objects such as vegetables, fruits, flowers and the like, is a great example of a Mannerist.
The name of the movement comes from the Italian word ‘maniera’ which simply means style. Indeed, Mannerists believed that natural paintings were too plain, too simple for life. They thought it best to spice up life with invention and refinement, as well as a virtuoso technique. Early Mannerists liked to use elongated forms, irrational settings and theatrical lighting. Thus perhaps it comes as no surprise that mannerist paintings often leave the viewer nervous and unsettled.

4. The Incoherents

The Incoherents was an art movement founded in 1882 by a Parisian writer and publisher Jules Levy. The movement exhibited drawings of children or people who did not know how to draw, “found” objects, parodies of famous art pieces as well as political and social satire. Thus, in that way, the movement was not only meant to serve as an artistic exhibition or an artistic outlet, but also as a form of public entertainment.
It started when Jules Levy decided to organize an evening whereby people who could not draw would be encouraged to draw and paint as well as create art in general. It was a huge success and a few months later, he repeated the experiment at his home in the company of his friends. Once again, the evening proved to be successful and resulted in extensive newspaper coverage. Before long, ‘The Incoherents’ were part of Parisian culture.
Unfortunately, in 1886, Levy became the target for criticism as people began to claim that he was using ‘The Incoherents’ for his own interests. Others too started using the name for their own endeavours – Incoherent cafes and magazines were established but in reality, they had nothing to do with the actual people taking part in the movement. Thus, Levy decided to end this movement, and while there were a couple brief recovery attempts, the movement was forgotten in the ashes of Parisian trends.

3. Dazzle Camouflage

Dazzle camouflage was a technique used to camouflage ships in World War I as well as World War II and after. It is also known as ‘dazzle camouflage’ or ‘razzle dazzle’ and is attributed to Norman Wilkinson.
Wilkinson, who was an artist and illustrator, as well as a Royal Navy volunteer in World War One, realized the danger of Germany U-boats and devised a plan to help the Allied ships with his artistic abilities.
Being fully aware that it is impossible to camouflage ships in a way that would render them unnoticeable, he decided that the very opposite was needed. Thus, crazy shapes and bold colors were painted on the ships to confuse the enemy, making it difficult for them to estimate the speed, size, and direction of the ships. However, the effectiveness of this technique was ever measured so it is unclear whether ‘razzle dazzle’ was in any way superior to plain ships.

2. Fauvism Art Movements

Fauvism emerged in the early Twentieth century in France and was one of the first successful avant-garde movements. The Fauves, which loosely translated means ‘the wild beasts’, expressed themselves through bold brushstrokes and vibrant, often unnatural colors which they applied directly from the tube. The artists preferred individual expression and intuition over academic theory and accurate representation. Thus, many paintings made by ‘Fauves’ were abstract and simple.
The movement gained its name after Louis Vauxcelles, an art critic, saw the paintings of Henri Matisse and Andre Derain, as well as various other artists, and called them ‘les fauves’ (wild beasts) in disapproval. Indeed, Vauxcelles went so far as to describe the artists behind the movement as ‘youngsters’ and the movement itself ‘dangerous’.

1. Stuckism Art Movement

Stuckism is an art movement that promotes figurative painting instead of conceptual art and was founded in 1999 by Charles Thomson and Billy Childish. The name for the movement came when Childish’s girlfriend insulted him by saying that his art was “stuck, stuck, stuck.” Stuckists strongly believe that art is more than just dead animals and beds and thus oppose to modern art, minimal art, conceptual art and the like.
Stuckists regularly oppose to the Turner Prize by holding demonstrations. On one occasion, they even dressed up as clowns. Over the years, these demonstrations have gained the movement a lot of media coverage. Stuckism has grown into a large, international movement which today has over 187 groups in 45 countries.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Follow us on FACEBOOK www.facebook.com/katarpillarart to get updated on art facts.
(c) http://www.wonderslist.com
_________________________________________________________________________________

Saturday, October 01, 2016




The Visualization of art is way different from its perception. There are several rules and norms to affiliate an art form and to categorize it under prevailing/new art movements. This process becomes more and more difficult when the particular art is subjected with a controversy or a long running debate. Photorealism, have similar fate. In simple words It’s an art to create or replicate a subject to make it appear real (almost like a photograph). Off course there’s lots of hard work and talent, that ignite the magic (and I am a real big fan). Although there were several points put up by many critics, discarding this genre from the art category. Debate on both sides are on fire and seriously non-conclusive.


In a traditional sense, drawing has been regarded as an imitative art, meaning that the artist usually creates images based on real things. Of course, this notion can be transposed from simple copying of entire scenes to creating a completely original assembly from bits and pieces of real/unreal things. But, to really confuse someone’s mind about whether the image in front of them is a mere photograph of an existing scene, or actually an uncanny drawing, the art style would be Photo-realism. Now, for a second, let us examine the actual term “uncanny”. It was coined back in 1906 to describe something in a bizarre state, perceived in terms of its uncertainty, but it took Sigmund Freud to attach the meaning to the word we use today. 


Uncanny is a concept of a particular moment when something is both familiar and alien at the same time, creating a feeling of discomfort. This is why photorealism is most often described with this particular word, because the best of the works from this style definitely blur out the lines between familiar and alien by creating something so close to reality that it actually perplexes the viewer. Before the stunning CGI artwork we have nowadays, there were artists who created paintings by hand, only by looking at a photograph. So let’s go back to the ’60s and ’70s, when Photorealism started emerging, and see why it received much positive and negative feedback from the art world, how it developed through the years and at which point “real” becomes “too real”…


Photorealism- Art or Not art
Arthor: Bob Lansroth

Whether it’s art or not, and where the line can be drawn between something considered as art or not is quite difficult to differentiate. For example, if someone with poor drawing abilities would draw a cat, it wouldn’t be considered as art, because it obviously doesn’t look much like a cat due to the fact it is badly drawn. Now, would it be art if that person could draw much better? Probably yes, now, since realism is often praised in the world of art, is there a point at which drawing becomes too real to be considered art? Of course, if you would take a photocopy or a scan, it wouldn’t be called art; it would just be a mechanical reproduction. But, once you include the human factor, a photorealistic image, made by hand and not by technological means of duplication, it magically becomes art. So, is it “just” the great technical skill that is enough for something to be considered as a piece of art, or does it require something more than incredible accuracy and immense drawing technique?


Many would argue that the technical skill can be surpassed by a decent color photocopier or a computer, thus avoid using the word art in such context, but this discussion brings us to an analogy of photography. If photography is merely capturing an image of what is already there, where is the art in that? It is right there in the photographer’s perspective, the exact choice made by the person wielding the camera in what to capture and from which angle, moment and perspective. If a person creating a photorealistic recreation of a photograph doesn’t have that “artistic” input of a photographer, then what is artistic about the process? Some would say even those renditions are not strict interpretations of photographs; instead, they incorporate additional, often subtle, pictorial elements to create the illusion of a reality which does not actually exist, or cannot be perceived by the human eye. In the end, as in many things in art, and life in general, the final conclusion remains behind the individual perspective. The answer lies in the eye of the beholder, whether you find the artistic strain within it, or just admire it for the sheer talent, Photorealism is remarkable and amazing in its own right.

At the end, I would like your suggestions and views on this topic. 

Thursday, September 29, 2016


As an art appreciator and a aficionado and the history tha brought us this entirely wonderful world. Not only that, it gave us the control of our expressions and, also taught us how to be uncontrolled. The whole field is immense and dynamic. The knowledge must be shared so that it could reach out new dimensions and adds up new perspectives.
#TalkArt #Express #Feel_d_Freedom

__________________________________________________________________________________

Follow and like  us on facebook https://www.facebook.com/katarpillarart



and share our views on instagram : Katarpillar_art

___________________________________________________________________________________

Wednesday, September 28, 2016




World+Art

Existence, realization and the curiosity to explore the world around us, gave us the persisting power to be the creator of our own individuality. The same process when subjected to the immense capacity to appreciate nature made us the sole creature to adulate and create art.

Art- might be a small word but it holds a much bigger and brighter world in itself. The echelons of human creativity and observation enable us to visualize the beautiful ambiance around us. It evolves through generations and it will always progress like his. Say, a Caterpillar and its journey. In fancy terms we call it “metamorphosis”. The renovation that it undergoes never stops. The process goes on making it more and more perfect. Art grows and evolves in the same way.

Our katarpillar, resembles this quintessence of nature that is kinetically progressing to be something more than beautiful, for it the purpose is to inspire and live like its own.

Welcome to that adobe which celebrates the art that prevailed through generations. Inspiring our life and changing our admiration for the inner as well as outer world. 
_________________________________________________________________________  
Follow and like  us on facebook https://www.facebook.com/katarpillarart
and share our views on instagram : Katarpillar_art

_________________________________________________________________________

Know us

Our Team

Contact us

Name

Email *

Message *