Today we are celebrating a craft, 8000 years old. Korean pottery and porcelain stands out and speaks for itself. The craftsmanship and intricacy remain undoubtedly above all. here a presentation of the masters of this craft. These artists are shaping new dimensions and expanding to new horizons with their master pieces.
Showing posts with label Art facts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art facts. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 12, 2016
Friday, October 07, 2016
Selfie V/s Selfportrait
As
selfies continue to rise in popularity around the world, it is useful to
explore the history of the self-portrait and find the distinction between
self-indulgence and art
Selfies
are nothing new. People have been creating self-portraits since the 15th
century; in fact, the first self-portraits were akin to modern day photo-bombs,
with artists painting themselves into crowd scenes in historical, mythological
or religious paintings. Jan van Eyck’s self-image can be seen in a mirror in
the Arnolfini Portrait (1434). Diego Velázquez painted himself into Las Meniñas
(1656), a portrait of the Spanish royal family, essentially setting himself up
as the first portrait-bomber, the first truly modern artist. An infant might
well have said, “Hey, I thought we were going to get a nice family portrait.
What’s Velázquez’ big head doing in the shot?”
Velázquez’
big breakout in painting himself into the portrait was essentially a statement
that the artist can be more important than the painting. He proclaimed to the
world that this portrait of royals also staked the claim that the artist is
greater than the work itself; the artist becomes one with his art.
Some
have speculated that Leonardo da Vinci’s Mona Lisa (1503–1506) may actually be
a self- portrait of the artist in drag. Though probably not so, it is
interesting to ponder that da Vinci, who did have a hidden side to himself,
could keep that aspect hidden, yet revealed simultaneously.
Virginia
Oldoini Countess of Castiglione (1837–1899), better known as La Castiglione, a
mistress of Napoleon, was the first to effectively and exhaustively use the new
medium of photography for her selfies. She had herself photographed over 700
times over four decades at a time when just one could be a day-long affair,
dressing herself as a variety of historical and mythological figures, usually
embedded in elaborate tableaux art directed by the Countess herself. She only
laid aside her photography practice after advancing age began to alter her
face. She could no longer stand seeing herself.
The
queen of self-portraiture in art history has to be Frida Kahlo, who was the
first major international artist to use herself as the central subject of
almost all of her work. Obsessed with self-image, she famously said, “I paint
myself because I am so often alone and because I am the subject I know best.”
Using
herself as a subject allowed her to expose herself and explore all her hopes,
fears, dreams, accidents, operations, miscarriages, infidelities, the
alarmingly public break-ups with famed artist husband, Diego Rivera, as well as
her highly publicized affair with Leon Trotsky, prior to his murder by Stalin.
Arguably
today’s “Mistress of Selfies” is Kim Kardashian, who posts pictures of herself
on social media that are picked up by news services and published daily, often
in excessively revealing costumes. Once, on a vacation to Thailand, Kardashian
took 1,200 selfies in a single week’s time. And in 2014, she published a book
containing 357 selfies. One wonders if she will stop taking selfies as she
ages, as others have done, or will she develop as an artist and begin to reveal
truly thoughtful insights on herself through her portraits. In the 22nd
Century, will the late Kim Kardashian be lauded as one of the great artists of
the early 21st Century, or will she be remembered, if at all, as a narcissistic
fame-whore?
Before
you take that next selfie and post it on your Facebook page or Instagram, ask
yourself what the portrait says about you, truly. Is it just another fish-lip
photo? Or are you revealing something real and true about yourself? Is it just
a selfie or is it art?
Enjoy!!
Wednesday, October 05, 2016
Verses of Satanic art
A new exhibition at Stanford University’s Cantor Arts Center,“Sympathy for the Devil: Satan, Sin, and the Underworld,” traces Lucifer’s visual history, from
his emergence in the Middle Ages as a horned, cloven-hoofed, foul-smelling,
diabolical creature of the night to his denuded and largely ironic image today.
“By around 1500, his visage and characteristics were pretty well
set,” Bernard Barryte, Cantor’s curator of European art, tells Quartz. “He was
initially a conflation of sundry things. Everything from Pan to Near Eastern
gods got mushed together in the Middle Ages and became what we know of as the
devil.”
In
the 16th and 17th century, grisly paintings of the Evil One were intended
literally, Barryte says.”They were meant to have a moral effect, which is why
artists made him awful looking. Even if you were educated, you would wonder,
‘What if?’ No matter how sceptical one might be today, there was real faith
underlying this imagery.”
The Enlightenment began to change that. As our conception of
evil shifted, so did our personification of the devil. “He becomes more human,
even romanticized, after the popular revolutions of the late 18th century,
especially the French Revolution,” Barryte says. In the 19th century, the devil
was often depicted as a “shrewd and wily dandy,” a Mephistophelean figure, who
would trick you out of your soul, not brutally tear it from you. “Fear is no
longer his most effective tactic,” Barryte says. “And in the 20th century, he
all but disappears except in advertisements.”
In his place—well, look in the mirror. “Hell is other people, is
how Jean-Paul Sartre put it,” Barryte says. “All the sources of evil seemed to
shift from some horrific other to mankind itself.”
For a nostalgic look at the devil’s many guises (along with
depictions of his realm and minions), here’s a selection of works in the
exhibition, which is on view through November 30:
Tuesday, October 04, 2016
10 bizarre art movements that you don't know exist!!!
Art can be complicated. Often, it is difficult
to interpret its meaning or unearth the message that the artist wants to
convey. Other times, it is difficult to understand the techniques and methods
used.
However, art also belongs to various different
categories and art movements that further complicate things. Some movements are
straightforward, others not so much. Below we have compiled a list of the
strangest and most obscure art movements that existed or still exist in the
world.
10. Intentism
If you have ever been to an art exhibition and
wondered what exactly the artist meant with his piece of art, you probably know
that sometimes understanding the meaning and intention of art can be rather
difficult. Perhaps there is no intention in art, we wonder. Or perhaps the
intention and the message is whatever we decide it to be. However, followers of
Intentism would disagree.
Intentism is an international art movement of
artists, authors, actors and musicians who believe that art can convey an
intended message to those viewing it.
Intentists follow three principles. Firstly,
they feel that artists are free to convey their message to society. Secondly,
they believe that confused, hidden or denied intentions lead to zero accountability.
Thirdly and lastly, they think that the exclusion of intention can lead to
enforced restrictions on the artist.
Indeed, Intentists believe that through the
rejection of intention and authorship, creative work becomes indifferent and
anaemic.
9. Orphism Art Movements
Orphism, also called Orphic Cubism or
Simultaneism, is a trend in abstract art which derived from Cubism. The
movement was named by a French poet, Guillaume Apollinaire, in 1912, and gives
priority to light and colour. Apollinaire thought that this new style of
painting brought musical qualities to the paintings. The name Orphism comes
from Orpheus, a poet and singer from ancient Greece mythology.
The movement was started by Robert Delaunay and
his wife, Sonia Delaunay-Terk. Unlike Cubists, they believed colour to be a
powerful element in their art, although just like Cubists, they were greatly
interested in geometric fragmentation.
The movement was short-lived and came to an end
before World War I.
8. Fluxus Art Movements
Fluxus was a group of artists that were known for blending
different artistic media in the 1960s. Fluxus artists could be found all over
the world but an especially large concentration of them could be found in New
York as well as various German cities.
George Maciunas is considered to be the main founder of the group.
He coined the name ‘Fluxus’ and edited the movement’s numerous publications.
Followers of Fluxus strongly disagreed with the idea that museums
have the right to decide the value of art. They also did not think that viewers
of art have to be in any way educated to view and understand art. Not only did
members of Fluxus desire to make all art acceptable to the public – they also
wanted to ensure that each and every individual produced art regurlarly.
7. Arte Povera
Arte povera, or poor art, was an artistic movement that emerged in
the 1960s. Members of this group were Italian artists who created their art
from commonplace materials such as rocks, clothing and paper. The group
rejected minimalism and modernist abstract painting.
The name of the movement was introduced by the Italian art critic
and curator, Germano Celant. He wanted the name to convey the notion of art
made without restraints, a complete and utter opennes to materials and
processes.
The group’s most memorable art, however, comes from their use of
unprocessed materials with references to consumer culture. The group aimed at
contrasting the new and the old to complicate our sense of the passing time.
6. Yellowism
In 2012, a vandal named Vladimir Umanets scrawled graffiti on Mark
Rothko’s mural which was on exhibit at London’s Tate Modern. The graffiti read
“Vladimir Umanets, A Potential Piece of Yellowism.” With that, the movement of
Yellowism gained international recognition.
Yellowism is an artistic movement run by two people – Vladimir
Umanets and Marcin Lodyga. The movement began in Egypt in 2010 when the first
exhibition was unveiled and has continued since, although grasping Yellowism is
not an easy task. Apparently, in order for a piece of art to be considered as a
part of Yellowism, it needs to be either displayed in a yellow gallery-like
space or signed by a Yellowist.
Umanets also says that “The main difference between Yellowism and
art is that in art you have got freedom of interpretation, in Yellowism you
don’t have freedom of interpretation, everything is about Yellowism, that’s
it.” Indeed, to most people the movement of Yellowism just seems like vandalism
and obscure nonsense, but perhaps Yellowists will eventually surprise us all.
5. Mannerism Art Movements
Mannerism originated in Italy in 1520, and soon spread throughout
Europe. Instead of focusing on naturalistic representations, this movement
concentrated on complexity and virtuosity. Giuseppe Arcimboldo, the artist
behind portraits made entirely of objects such as vegetables, fruits, flowers and
the like, is a great example of a Mannerist.
The name of the movement comes from the Italian word ‘maniera’
which simply means style. Indeed, Mannerists believed that natural paintings
were too plain, too simple for life. They thought it best to spice up life with
invention and refinement, as well as a virtuoso technique. Early Mannerists
liked to use elongated forms, irrational settings and theatrical lighting. Thus
perhaps it comes as no surprise that mannerist paintings often leave the viewer
nervous and unsettled.
4. The Incoherents
The Incoherents was an art movement founded in 1882 by a Parisian
writer and publisher Jules Levy. The movement exhibited drawings of children or
people who did not know how to draw, “found” objects, parodies of famous art
pieces as well as political and social satire. Thus, in that way, the movement
was not only meant to serve as an artistic exhibition or an artistic outlet,
but also as a form of public entertainment.
It started when Jules Levy decided to organize an evening whereby
people who could not draw would be encouraged to draw and paint as well as
create art in general. It was a huge success and a few months later, he
repeated the experiment at his home in the company of his friends. Once again,
the evening proved to be successful and resulted in extensive newspaper
coverage. Before long, ‘The Incoherents’ were part of Parisian culture.
Unfortunately, in 1886, Levy became the target for criticism as
people began to claim that he was using ‘The Incoherents’ for his own
interests. Others too started using the name for their own endeavours –
Incoherent cafes and magazines were established but in reality, they had
nothing to do with the actual people taking part in the movement. Thus, Levy
decided to end this movement, and while there were a couple brief recovery
attempts, the movement was forgotten in the ashes of Parisian trends.
3. Dazzle Camouflage
Dazzle camouflage was a technique used to camouflage ships in
World War I as well as World War II and after. It is also known as ‘dazzle
camouflage’ or ‘razzle dazzle’ and is attributed to Norman Wilkinson.
Wilkinson, who was an artist and illustrator, as well as a Royal
Navy volunteer in World War One, realized the danger of Germany U-boats and
devised a plan to help the Allied ships with his artistic abilities.
Being fully aware that it is impossible to camouflage ships in a
way that would render them unnoticeable, he decided that the very opposite was
needed. Thus, crazy shapes and bold colors were painted on the ships to confuse
the enemy, making it difficult for them to estimate the speed, size, and
direction of the ships. However, the effectiveness of this technique was ever
measured so it is unclear whether ‘razzle dazzle’ was in any way superior to
plain ships.
2. Fauvism Art Movements
Fauvism emerged in the early Twentieth century in France and was
one of the first successful avant-garde movements. The Fauves, which loosely
translated means ‘the wild beasts’, expressed themselves through bold
brushstrokes and vibrant, often unnatural colors which they applied directly
from the tube. The artists preferred individual expression and intuition over
academic theory and accurate representation. Thus, many paintings made by ‘Fauves’
were abstract and simple.
The movement gained its name after Louis Vauxcelles, an art
critic, saw the paintings of Henri Matisse and Andre Derain, as well as various
other artists, and called them ‘les fauves’ (wild beasts) in disapproval.
Indeed, Vauxcelles went so far as to describe the artists behind the movement
as ‘youngsters’ and the movement itself ‘dangerous’.
1. Stuckism Art Movement
Stuckism is an art movement that promotes figurative painting
instead of conceptual art and was founded in 1999 by Charles Thomson and Billy
Childish. The name for the movement came when Childish’s girlfriend insulted
him by saying that his art was “stuck, stuck, stuck.” Stuckists strongly
believe that art is more than just dead animals and beds and thus oppose to
modern art, minimal art, conceptual art and the like.
Stuckists regularly oppose to the Turner Prize by holding
demonstrations. On one occasion, they even dressed up as clowns. Over the
years, these demonstrations have gained the movement a lot of media coverage.
Stuckism has grown into a large, international movement which today has over
187 groups in 45 countries.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Follow us on FACEBOOK www.facebook.com/katarpillarart to get updated on art facts.
(c) http://www.wonderslist.com
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Follow us on FACEBOOK www.facebook.com/katarpillarart to get updated on art facts.
(c) http://www.wonderslist.com
_________________________________________________________________________________